## Introduction to the Event Study Methodology

Finance theory suggests that stock prices reflect all available information about the prospects of firms. Given this basic premise, one can study how a particular event changes a firm's prospects by quantifying its impact on the firm's stock price. Finance scholars developed the 'event study methodology' to perform such an assessment/analysis.

Conceptually, event study analyses differentiate between the returns that would have been expected if the analyzed event would not have taken place (normal returns) and the returns that were caused by the respective event (abnormal returns). The different analytic techniques for estimating abnormal returns differ with respect to the model used for predicting the normal returns around the event date.

The 'market model' is one of the most common models used. It builds on the actual returns of a reference market and the correlation of the firm's stock with the reference market. Equation (1) describes the model formally. The abnormal return on a distinct day within the event window represents the difference between the actual stock return ($R_{i,t}$) on that day and the normal return, which is predicted based on two inputs; the typical relationship between the firm's stock and its reference index (expressed by the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ parameters), and the actual reference market's return ($R_{m,t}$).

$$AR_{i,t}=R_{i,t}-(\alpha_i+\beta_i R_{m,t}) (1)$$

Such an analysis performed for multiple events of the same event type (i.e., a sample study) may yield typical stock market response patterns, which have been at the center of prior academic research. Typical abnormal returns associated with a distinct point of time before or after the event day are defined as follows.

$$AAR= \frac{1}{N} \sum\limits_{i=1}^{N}AR_{i,t} (2)$$

To measure the total impact of an event over a particular period of time (termed the 'event window'), one can add up individual abnormal returns to create a 'cumulative abnormal return'. Equation (2) formally shows this practice. The most common event window found in research is a three day event window starting at $t_1=-1$ and ending at $t_2=1$.

$$CAR(t_1,t_2)=\sum\limits_{t=t_1}^{t_2} AR_{i,t} (3)$$

Figure 1 plots the CAR values of two different corporate event types, 'FDA approvals' and the issuance of 'special dividends' as they change when the event window is gradually extended. The figure suggests that capital market perceive both event types as good news.

Figure 1: Cumulative Abnormal Returns Over Expanding Event Windows Lengths

Adapted from Neuhierl et al. (2011: 48)

In a 'sample event study' that holds multiple observations of individual event types (e.g., acquisitions), one can further calculate 'cumulative average abnormal returns (CAARs)', which represent the mean values of identical events. Equation 3 shows the formal equation for CAARs and Figure 2 illustrates CAARs and their standard deviations at the example of a ten year study in the global insurance industry (Schimmer, 2012). The presented CAARs represent the average stock market responses (in percent) to press releases describing different types of corporate decisions.

$$CAAR= \frac{1}{n} \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}CAR(t_1,t_2) (4)$$

Figure 2: Cumulative Average Abnormal Returns (-1,+1) in a Sample Event Study

Own Figure

For a further introduction to the methodology, you may also view this third-party video from youtube:

**References and additional links**

Neuhierl, A., Scherbina, A. and Schlusche, B. 2011. 'Market reaction to corporate press releases'. *Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1556532*.

Schimmer, M. 2012. *Competitive dynamics in the global insurance industry: Strategic groups, competitive moves, and firm performance*. Wiesbaden: SpringerGabler.